Navigasjon

  • Hopp til innhold
NTNU Hjemmeside

Concept

  • Concept
  • QA scheme
    • The State Project Model
    • Background and history
    • The quality assurance scheme
    • Guidance
    • QA reports
    • Concept's role
  • Research activities
    • Research activities
    • Data collection
    • Research projects
    • Doctoral work
    • For students
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Books
    • Concept report series
    • Concept monographs
    • Evaluation reports
    • Working papers
    • Articles and papers
    • Software and tools
    • Newsletter
    • Student master’s thesis
  • Ex post evaluation
    • Ex-post evaluation
    • Evaluation criteria
    • Evaluation results
    • Evaluation reports (Norwegian)
  • Concept Symposium
    • Concept Symposium
    • Symposium 2026
    • Symposium 2024
    • Symposium 2022
    • Symposium 2018
    • Symposium 2016
    • Symposium 2014
    • Symposium 2012
    • Symposium 2010
    • Symposium 2008
    • Symposium 2006
    • Symposium 2003
  • About the programme
    • About the programme
    • The programme founder Knut Samset
    • Our goals
    • Organization
    • Research group
    • Contact
  1. Ex post evaluation
  2. Ex-post evaluation

Språkvelger

Norsk

Ex-post evaluation

×
  • Ex-post evaluation
  • Evaluation criteria
  • Evaluation results
  • Evaluation reports (Norwegian)
MENY

Ex post evaluation

Ex post evaluation

Ex post evaluation looks at the realised benefits of a given project and is an important part of understanding the efficiency of public spending. Hence, it is a central part of the Concept research programmes activities. The purpose of the ex post evaluations is to learn and develop knowledge for future projects. Concept began ex post evaluations in 2012. A pilot evaluation of four projects was presented in Concept report no. 30. It was based on OECDs evaluation criteria, consisting of five criteria, in addition to benefit-cost efficiency. A meta-study was conducted in 2017 which looked at 20 of the evaluated projects and is presented in Concept report no. 52. Alongside this study, a set of guidelines was formed in order to secure that the evaluations were conducted similarly and that the criteria were interpreted equally. The guidelines addressees’ central dimensions of the criteria and how an evaluation is expected to answer them. They also mention the kind of documentation that is expected to be retrieved and used as part of the evaluation.

There are two to four evaluations conducted yearly. Some of the evaluations are conducted by Concept and some are advertised and conducted by external actors. The evaluations are publicised as reports, but also summarised and presented on a separate site. The reports and their summaries are written in Norwegian.

NTNU – Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet

  • For ansatte
  • |
  • For studenter
  • |
  • Innsida
  • |
  • Blackboard

Studere

  • Om studier
  • Studieprogram
  • Emner
  • Videreutdanning
  • Karriere

Aktuelt

  • Nyheter
  • Arrangement
  • Jobbe ved NTNU

Om NTNU

  • Om NTNU
  • Bibliotek
  • Strategi
  • Forskning
  • Satsingsområder
  • Innovasjon
  • Organisasjonskart
  • Utdanningskvalitet

Kontakt

  • Kontakt oss
  • Finn ansatte
  • Spør en ekspert
  • Pressekontakter
  • Kart

NTNU i tre byer

  • NTNU i Gjøvik
  • NTNU i Trondheim
  • NTNU i Ålesund

Om nettstedet

  • Bruk av informasjonskapsler
  • Tilgjengelighetserklæring
  • Personvern
  • Ansvarlig redaktør
Logg inn
NTNU logo