Navigation

  • Skip to Content
NTNU Home NTNU Home

Department of Structural Engineering

  • Studies
    • Master's programmes in English
    • For exchange students
    • PhD opportunities
    • All programmes of study
    • Courses
    • Financing
    • Language requirements
    • Application process
    • Academic calendar
    • FAQ
  • Research and innovation
    • NTNU research
    • Research excellence
    • Strategic research areas
    • Innovation resources
    • PhD opportunities
  • Life and housing
    • Student in Trondheim
    • Student in Gjøvik
    • Student in Ålesund
    • For researchers
    • Life and housing
  • About NTNU
    • Contact us
    • Faculties and departments
    • Libraries
    • International researcher support
    • Vacancies
    • About NTNU
    • Maps
  1. Department of Structural Engineering Research Conceptual Structural Design
  2. Research
  3. Modern engineering design

Språkvelger

Norsk

Modern engineering design - Research - Conceptual Structural Design - Department of Structural Engineering

×
  • Research
    • Structural Mechanics
    • Conceptual Structural Design
      • Personnel
      • Research
        • Orkla bridges (2016)
        • Trondheim gridshell (2015)
        • Trondheim HolzBau Pier (2014)
        • Rjukan Torgstova (2013)
        • Functionality of form
        • Parametric modelling
        • Modern engineering design
        • Digital production and assembly
        • Bridge generator algorithm
        • Virtual reality
        • PrintShell (2016)
        • Footbridge Berlin (2017)
        • Parametric Camp
      • Publications
      • Project and master theses
      • Newsletter
    • SIMLab
    • Concrete
MENU

Modern engineering design

Modern engineering design

- A knowledge-based educational concept of structural design

 

Karusell Modern Engineering Design

  • Beyond simple geometry - force flow in large and small openings, respectively, in a concrete thin-shell model. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Beyond simple geometry - force flow in large and small openings, respectively, in a concrete thin-shell model. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

     

     

  • Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has no edge beams, rightmost has edge beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has no edge beams, rightmost has edge beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

     

     

  • Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has beams, rightmost is without beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has beams, rightmost is without beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

     

     

  • Beyond simple geometry - force flow in large and small openings, respectively, in a concrete thin-shell model. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Beyond simple geometry - force flow in large and small openings, respectively, in a concrete thin-shell model. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

     

     

  • Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has no edge beams, rightmost has edge beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Concrete thin-shell model. Leftmost picture has no edge beams, rightmost has edge beams. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

     

     

PrevNext
1
2
3

Modern engineering design text

The form of a structure inspires both architects and engineers, but their educational background have different focus regarding form and functionality. Architects tend to focus on the form of the structure, and are fond of irregular geometries and organic shapes. For most architects the approach as well as the goal is the entire building where load-bearing elements are only one aspect of many. These must be thoughtfully handled to achieve beautiful and meaningful buildings. Structural engineers on the other hand are more concerned with the functionality of the structure. Not surprisingly, the common approach of the structural engineer tends to go towards optimizations, which involves finding the minimum cross section or reinforcement needed.

Can a corner-supported barrel vault be modelled as a simply supported beam? Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Can a corner-supported barrel vault be modelled as a simply supported beam? Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

A knowledge-based educational concept for structural design is proposed to highlight the importance for students to further explore structures. To accomplish a creative collaboration, the engineer should be able to assist the architect as to what extent the shape and material can be structurally improved without having to use detailed models or calculations. Thus, the engineer should have knowledge of relevant key buildings, be able to grasp the architectural essence of the architects’ building proposal and be able to interpret complex shapes as combinations of underlying basic shapes. We propose the following methodology for exploring structures:

  • Establish an overall or by-component functionality hypothesis
  • Conduct evaluation and analyses at appropriate levels from calculation via flowcharts to FE-analyses
  • Conclusions of the lesson learned

Studies of structural variations. Cross vault force flow through lobes to groins. The Mises stress pictures represent a pointed overhang, influence of groin beams and influence of edge beams, respectively. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.Studies of structural variations. Cross vault force flow through lobes to groins. The Mises stress pictures represent a pointed overhang, influence of groin beams and influence of edge beams, respectively. Illustration: NTNU/Anders Rønnquist.

The educational background of the two is currently not truly compatible even though there is an interdependence between architectural intended form and structural engineering demands, which makes collaboration inevitable. To address this a platform is provided where students better can discover and understand the structural engineering potential of contemporary architecture. We hope to assist and explore the urge of structural engineers for fulfilling both architectural requests and engineering requirements. That is, to suggest how this urge can be implemented to enhance the current theoretical intensive educational pathway.

Projects:

This is an ongoing educational project based in the master program.

References:

Rønnquist A., Manum B. (2015) The functionality of form: exploring traditional shell structures to supplement modern engineering design, IABSE Conference, Nara, 2015.

Contact Anders Rønnquist

Contact

Professor Anders Rønnquist

Phone: +47 735 94 663

E-mail: anders.ronnquist@ntnu.no

NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  • For employees
  • |
  • For students
  • |
  • Intranet
  • |
  • Blackboard

Studies

  • Master's programmes in English
  • For exchange students
  • PhD opportunities
  • Courses
  • Career development
  • Continuing education
  • Application process

News

  • NTNU News
  • Vacancies

About NTNU

  • About the university
  • Libraries
  • NTNU's strategy
  • Research excellence
  • Strategic research areas
  • Organizational chart

Contact

  • Contact NTNU
  • Employees
  • Find experts
  • Press contacts
  • Researcher support
  • Maps

NTNU in three cities

  • NTNU in Gjøvik
  • NTNU in Trondheim
  • NTNU in Ålesund

About this website

  • Use of cookies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Privacy policy
  • Editorial responsibility
Facebook Instagram Linkedin Snapchat Tiktok Youtube
Sign In
NTNU logo