Online modelling of risk for DP operations

Online modelling of risk for DP operations

A dynamically positioned (DP) vessel relies on a computer system to maintain position and heading or stay on a predetermined track. DP is used for a variety of operations. Within the offshore industry it is, for example, used for offloading, drilling, diving, subsea intervention, seismic and construction operations. All DP operations are inherently threatened by loss of position, and operators often only have a short response time to correct or mitigate such losses (Chen & Moan 2005). 

IMO (1994) has defined three DP classes. The basis of the classification is the worst single failure modes.

  • Equipment class 1: loss of position may occur after a single failure,
  • Equipment class 2: loss of position should not occur after a single failure of an active component,
  • Equipment class 3: Loss of position should not occur from any single failure (including flooded watertight component and fire in subdivision.

A manifold of human and organizational factors, technical (design) failures, environmental conditions, or a combination of these, can initiate a loss of position. Loss of position can result in major accidents, such as collision, loss of well integrity, damage to subsea structures, rupture of loading hoses, etc. Operations where loss of position may have severe consequences typically require DP equipment class 2 or 3.

Despite these redundancy requirements, statistics from recent years (Vinnem 2013, Lundborg 2014) reveal that the frequency of accidents during the last ten years for FPSO (Floating Production Storage and Offloading) shuttle tanker offloading DP operations is significantly above the risk acceptance criteria. The frequency is roughly one order of magnitude higher than what is deemed acceptable. It is  therefore imperative that effective preventive and mitigating actions are implemented to reduce the operational risk and the potential for major accidents.

During the operational phase, real-time data is available that can serve as input for risk assessment. The Norwegian petroleum safety authority (PSA) requires that risk analyses are updated from design and construction to operations (PSA 2015). An online risk model for operational risk to support DP related decision-making is therefore a logical next step in improving the safety of DP operations (Vinnem et al. 2015).

 Vinnem et al. (2015) have developed a conceptual online risk management framework (see Figure 1). The framework is meant to present the operators with a real-time risk picture and give early warnings of deviations in the system. The online risk management framework Is based on online risk models that build on date from various sources, for example: historical data, sensors, measurements, experience data.

An online risk management framework solution can be developed as an independent software solution integrated into the bridge or central control room or the solution can be integrated with existing software.

The online risk model will warn the operator of deviations in the system, but the model could also be further developed to instigate action if the appropriate operator response does not occur (Vinnem et al. 2015). An online risk model and decision support tool may give the operators early warning signals of events that may lead to a loss of position, giving the operator more time to respond and handle the situation.

Sources:

Chen, H. & Moan, T., 2005. FPSO - shuttle tanker collision risk reduction. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 127: 345 – 352.

IMO, 1994. Guidelines for vessels for dynamic positioning system. London: International Maritime Organization.

Lundborg, K.E.M. 2014. Human Technical Factors in FPSO-Shuttle Tanker interactions and their influence on the Collision Risk during Operations in the North Sea. M.Sc. Thesis: NTNU.

Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) 2015. Management Regulations §16: General requirements for analysis, retrieved from ptil.no on 09.12.2016.

Vinnem, J.E. 2013. Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies (3rd ed., Springer Series in Reliability Engineering). London: Springer.

Vinnem, J.E., Utne, I.B. & Schjølberg, I. 2015. On the need for online decision support in FPSO–shuttle tanker collision risk reduction. Ocean Engineering 101: 109-117.

Message from the project manager

Message from the project manager

Our first FPSO operational safety R&D project was launched in 1996. Incident frequencies were sky high, and there was a dire need for improvements.
 
Luckily, authorities, operators and ship owners were very interested to work together to achieve risk reduction. Haibo Chen took his PhD at IMT, NTNU during this period. When we completed that phase in 2003, we saw significant improvements.
 
But incident frequencies are still high.
 
Our renewed initiative was launched in 2015 as an SFI application (which failed), and is therefore mainly focused on the work done by post-doc and PhD candidates. There is also strong interest from several organisations this time around; Equinor, Transocean, Teekay and Kongsberg Maritim have all showed their interest.
 

Objectives and scope

Objectives and scope

Objectives

The objectives of online risk modelling are:

  • Provide a real-time risk picture
  • Give early warnings of deviations in the system
  • Improve decision-support for DP operators
  • Improve HMI in DP operator stations in order to improve response to abnormal scenarios

Scope

The scope of the project covers all types of vessels where a DP system is used to maintain position and/or heading, where deviations in position/heading fixing may have severe consequences for the safety of people, environment or assets.

We focus on all types of vessels, such as

  • Shuttle tankers
  • Drilling rigs
  • Diving support vessels
  • Standby vessels
  • Well servicing vessels
  • Walk-to-work vessels

Network

Network

We have established a network of personnel that we discuss with, and who have kindly supplied us with data:

  • Equinor: Bjørn Nygård
  • Songa: Tommy Bauge
  • Haibo Chen
  • Kongsberg Maritime: Torbjørn Hals
  • Kongsberg Training: Ole Johan Bjørke
  • AMOS
  • University of Los Angeles: Ali Mosleh

Publications and data

Publications and data

PhD thesis:

Sandra Hogenboom, 2020: Decision-making for Dynamic Positioning Operations in the Offshore Industry – A Human Factors based Approach, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

Data:

The following links provide access to the data used in postdoc Tarannom Parhizkar´s publications:

https://github.com/parhizkar-code/Dynamic-Positioning/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351765753_Dynamic-Positioning_Failure_Data_set

In this file, the historical data for failure modes of different types of dynamic positioning systems are presented. The data are derived from International Marine Contractors Association incident reports for years between 2004-2015.

Dynamic positioning types are: 1 Supply vessel, 2 Shuttle tanker, 3 Drilling vessel/unit, 4 Diving support vessel, 5 Flotel vessel, 6 Cable/pipe Laying vessel, 7 ROV (IMR), 8 Survey vessel, 9 Rock Dumping vessel, 10 Construction Support vessel, 11 Trenching/Dredging vessel, 12 Crane vessel.

Mode/Status: 1 Approaching, 2 Connecting, 3 Operating, 4 Disconnecting.

Main systems (components) are: 1 Propulsion system, 2 Reference system, 3 Computer system, 4 Power system, 5 Human factors, 6 Environmental/External factors.

Consequences are: 1 Drift off, 2 Drive off, 3 Loss of Position (LOP), 4 Potential incidents.

References:

Parhizkar, T., Hogenboom, S., Vinnem, J. E., & Utne, I. B. (2020). Data driven approach to risk management and decision support for dynamic positioning systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 201, 106964.

Parhizkar, T., Utne, I. B., & Vinnem, J. E. (2021). Online Risk Assessment of Complex Automated Systems – Principles, Modelling and Applications Book. Publishing by Springer.

References for the entire project:

Parhizkar, T., Hogenboom, S., Vinnem, J. E., & Utne, I. B. (2020). Data driven approach to risk management and decision support for dynamic positioning systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 201, 106964.

Parhizkar, T., Utne, I. B., & Vinnem, J. E. (2021). Online Risk Assessment of Complex Automated Systems – Principles, Modelling and Applications Book. To be published by Springer.

Hogenboom, Sandra; Rokseth, Børge; Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer. (2020) Human Reliability and the Impact of Control Function Allocation in the Design of Dynamic Positioning Systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. vol. 194.

Hogenboom, S., Rokseth, B., Vinnem, J.E., Utne, I.B. (2018). Human Reliability and the Impact of Control Function Allocation in the Design of Dynamic Positioning Systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety.

Hogenboom, S., Vinnem, J.E., Utne, I.B. (2017). Towards an online risk model for DP operations: Decision-making and risk information. ESREL 2017 Conference Proceedings Portoroz.

Hogenboom, S., Vinnem, J.E., Utne, I.B. (2017). Organizational risk indicators for dynamic positioning operations – Learnings from 20 years of FPSO – shuttle tanker incidents and accidents. ESREL 2017 Conference Proceedings Portoroz.

Dong, Yining; Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer. (2017) Improving safety of DP operations: learning from accidents and incidents during offshore loading operations. EURO Journal on Decision Processes. vol. 5.

Dong, Yining; Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer. (2018) Towards an online risk model for dynamic positioning operations. Safety and Reliability-Safety Societies in a Changing World: Proceedings of ESREL 2018.

Dong, Yining; Rokseth, Børge; Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer. (2016) Analysis of dynamic positioning system accidents and incidents with emphasis on root causes and barrier failures. Risk, Reliability, and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016.

Jiang, Yuhan (2014). Offshore QRA: Assessing Safety During DP Operations, Master Thesis for Nordic Master in Marine Engineering (NTNU+DTU).

Lundborg, Mage Erik K. (2014). Human Technical Factors in FPSO-Shuttle Tanker interactions and their influence on the Collision Risk during Operations in the North Sea, Master thesis NTNU.

Rokseth, Børge; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer; Vinnem, Jan Erik. (2018) Deriving Verification Objectives and Scenarios for Maritime Systems Using the Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. vol. 169.

Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer; Schjølberg, Ingrid. (2015) On the need for online decision support in FPSO-shuttle tanker collision risk reduction. Ocean Engineering. vol. 101.

Vinnem, Jan Erik; Utne, Ingrid Bouwer. (2015) Risk reduction for floating offshore installations through barrier management, Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2015, May 31-June 5, 2015, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, OMAE2015-41112.