Teaching

The teaching consists of introductory lectures, a workshop and seminars distributed over 5 modules. 

The modules are organized over a period of two to four days. The seminars in modules 2 and 3 require active participation from the students. Examination is in the form of written and oral presentation of group tasks and written individual assignments, related to the participants research interests.

Forms of evaluation: Essay. 

All students are assigned a group of 4-5 participants prior to the course to ensure a good mix and discussion across academic disciplines and different fields of research.

All lectures/seminars take place at meeting room "Hjerneteppet," building 9, level 4 at Campus Dragvoll.

Course content

Module 1. (27.- 29. January: 13.15-16.00 Hjerneteppet). H. Leiulfsrud

Introduction, including brief presentations of each student´s Ph.d projects.  Basic concepts and perspectives. 

An overview of ontological and epistemological traditions and their implications for contemporary social/behavioural science. 

Paradigmatic traditions - programmatic and methodological standpoints. Controversies within the field of philosophy of science.  

Module 2. (10. – 12. February 13.15-16.00. Hjerneteppet). H. Leiulfsrud

Interdisciplinary perspectives. The role of values in research. 

Research ethics in the research process and the organization of research

Seminar I: Ethical dilemmas

Seminar II: Presentations of individual Ph.d projects.

Module 3 (10.-14. March. 13.15-16.00. Hjerneteppet). P.Sohlberg & H. Leiulfsrud

Philosophy of science. Methodological implications and strategies. The building blocks of social science - definitions and concept-formation. 

Descriptive strategies. Traditions of interpretation. Forms of aggregation and strategies of inference. Forms of explanation and explanatory strategies. 

The practical use of theory. Social and behavioral science: a cumulative project? 

Seminar III: Follow up on the assignments/exam

Seminar IV: Group presentations based on Abbott

Module 4 (23. April 10.15-16.00 & 24. April 13.15-16.00 Hjerneteppet). H. Leiulfsrud

Workshop related to the exam 

Module 5 (26.-27. May. Hjerneteppet, 09.15-16.00) H.Leiulfsrud

Feedback and tutorial related to individual exam papers

The deadline for submitting the exam paper is 15. May at 12am

Learning outcome

To give the students extensive training in philosophy of science and the application of perspectives of philosophy of science on the research process.

Knowledge: The doctoral student

• has a good overview of the field of philosophy of science, including concepts, perspectives, theories and conflicts, and has knowledge of its implications for own research.
• can identify basic paradigmatic traditions within social science and knows the importance of these traditions for contemporary social science and their consequences for interdisciplinary perspectives.
• has a reflective approach, based on philosophy of science, to the knowledge- fronts within her/his research field.
• has a reflective approach, based on philosophy of science, to the relation between robustness and innovation in research.

SFEL8000 = A course of laboratory character

The course has largely what could be called a "laboratory character", meaning that concepts and topics of philosophy of science are applied on research within the participant's own research tradition. Consequently, it is to prefer that the participants have begun working with the thesis, making it possible to relate their own work to themes of philosophy of science. If the participant not formally has begun working with the thesis it is necessary that a research plan is formulated, specifying research questions, method (s) and theoretical perspective (s).

Course materials

Text marked in bold is higly recommended.

Relevant literature: Selection to be made, dependent on participant’s research interests. 

• Abbot, A. 2004. Methods of Discovery. Heuristics for the Social Sciences, New York, London, W.W. Norton & Company. 
• Baert, P. 2013. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Towards Pragmatism, Cambridge, Polity. 
• Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade. How to Think About Your Research While You Are Doing It. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 
• Benton, T. & Craib, I. 2001. Philosophy of Social Science. The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 
• Bird, A. & Ladyman, J. 2013. Arguing About Science, Routledge. 
• Blaikie, N. & Priest, J. (2017). Social Research: paradigms in Action. Cambridge: Polity. 
• Bourdieu, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Oxford: Polity.
• Briggle, A. & Mircham, C. 2015. Ethics and Science. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
• Couvalis, G. 1997. The Philosophy of Science. Science and Objectivity, London, Sage. 
• Dancy, J. Sandis, C. 2015. Philosophy of Action. An Anthology, Wiley Blackwell.
• Delanty, G. & Strydom, P. (eds.) .2003. Philosophies of Social Science. The Classic and Contemporary Readings. Maidenhead; Philadelphia: Open University Press. 
• Gergen, K.J. & Gergen, M. (eds.) (2003). Social construction: a reader. London, Sage. 
• Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press. 
• Harding, S. (ed.).2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge. 
• Hollis, M. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 
• Kim, J. 2011. Philosophy of Mind. Third edition, Westview Press. 
• Kuhn, T. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 50th Anniversary edition. With an Introductory Essay by Ian Hacking, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. 
• Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think. Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, Cambridge Massachusetts, London, Harvard University Press. 
• Leiulfsrud, H. & Sohlberg, P. (eds) 2021, Constructing Social Research Objects. Constructionism in Research Practice, Brill. 
• Leiulfsrud, H. & Sohlberg, P.(eds.) 2019. Concepts in Action. Conceptual Constructionism. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. 
• Martin. M. & McIntyre. L. C. (eds.) 1994. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge, Mass. The MIT-Press. 
• Montuschi, E.2003. The Objects of Social Science. London: Continuum. 
• Newton-Smith, W.H. (ed).2001. A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 
• Nowotny, H. Scott, P., Gibbons, M. 2011. Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity. 
• O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C. 2013. A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, Wiley-Blackwell. 
• Radder, H. (ed). 2003. The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, Pittsburgh, The University of Pittsburgh Press. 
• Sayer, R.A. (2010). Method in social science: a realist approach. (Rev. 2. ed.) London: Routledge. 
• Sohlberg, P. 2021, Functionalist Construction Work in Social Science, Brill. 
• Sohlberg, P & Leiulfsrud, H. (eds.) 2017. Theory in action theoretical constructionism. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. 
• Steel, D. & Guala, F (eds). 2011. The Philosophy of Social Science Reader, London and New York, Routledge. 
• Symons, J. and Calvo, P. 2012. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology, London and New York, Routledge. 
• Tavory, I & Timmermans S.2014. Abductive Analysis. Theorizing Qualitative Research, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. 
• Williams, M. 2001. Problems of knowledge. A critical introduction to Epistemology. Oxford University Press, 2001.
• General guideline for research ethics

+ Literature related to the participant's specific research interests.